incandescent light bulb compact fluorescent, to be or not to be?
Today, one of the biggest marketing campaigns that many want to save energy costs and attract consumers to join the "green energy campaign" is the use of compact fluorescent bulbs ).While these bulb types are actually more effective, there is no mention of the aesthetic disadvantage of using them in motion.The biggest drawback that comes to mind is the dimming factor.Although this technology does allow dimming, the CFLs dimming capability is not close to that of conventional incandescent lamps.Dimming is better in some applications than in others, but with CFL it is often necessary to have particularly expensive components.The truth is that CFL technology is not fully ready to squeeze incandescent lamps out of the market, but the outlook will certainly be brighter in the near future.The following article further explains the details of the current technology and its impact on the market and the environment.Michael Siminovitch, director of the California Lighting Technology Center at the University of California, Davis, said.F.L.America may be much better than them.Reader's response to two recent green companiesThe post makes it very clear that while the efficiency of compact fluorescent bulbs is admittedly higher, many consumers see them as unattractive.The affirmation of this discontent comes from an unlikely source: Selfdescribed C.F.L.An advocate and professor and director of the California Lighting Technology Center at the University of California, Davis.Mr. Siminovitch said that the technology exists to create C.F.L.Comparable to incandescent lamps."Today they can be configured and manufactured in Great colors," he said ."."They can also be darkened.They can also be combined in a way that lasts a long time.”And yet, Mr.Many manufacturers have been cutting corners, says Siminovitch.F.L.Lower quality products on the market distort the consumer's perception of the technology.Green Inc.Chat with Mr. recentlySiminovitch on bulb performance and efficiency, consumer expectations and "Super C"F.L.Except for other things.***Green Inc.After a recent post, the reader expressed disappointment at the quality of the compact fluorescent lamp.Do you think their criticism is reasonable?I think we actually see a high level of awareness of these issues and issues.People are interested in participating in the energy efficiency equation, and what is happening [and] is that they are now in conflict with this issue.That's what they said. Hey, it's not enough.How can they lag behind?Consumers buy a light source that looks good and provides high quality lighting in one space.To save energy, they usually don't go to the store to buy light sources.Incandescent lamps are usually very flattering in rendering the skin and enhancing our look.Consumers are used to the very high color quality at home.Compact fluorescent lamps can deviate from or produce less color quality in rendering colors in space."Of course, we ask consumers to do more than they did in the past.” —Michael siminovitches some fluorescent lights are nice but not a lot.I think what we are seeing today is that we are starting to go against our expectations for the quality of color in the home, because energy-saving technologies do not meet our expectations.So consumers are not satisfiedThis is for granted.The next big problem is getting dark.Many fluorescent lamps that are available for use do not darken well.The brightness of incandescent lamps is very good.They darken from 100% light to 0% light.They did very well and were very predictable.Consumers are used to this smooth dimming.Usually, when you dim a compact fluorescent, it flashes, it gives a buzz, it creates a variety of consequences that I call "unexpected" and disturbs consumers.Therefore, consumers have left lessthan-Satisfaction with this technology.The third is product life.Consumers expect compact fluorescent lamps to last for a long time --Much longer than the incandescent lamp they replaced.This is technically achievable.Compact fluorescent lamps can be used for a long time.Unfortunately, I think we have had a big impact on the quality of many compact fluorescent lamps that will not last as long as consumers believe.This is a problem.How did we end up with such a low score?Quality products?Early compact fluorescent lamps as ...... Technology enters the market, this technology is very small, very compact, can fit where we traditionally place incandescent lamps, and have the opportunity to get a good color, we want to see long life and various properties in the light source.But it's expensive.It is an order of magnitude more expensive than we have traditionally used."In terms of compact fluorescent lamps," he said ."Siminovitch, "We compromised on quality."As a result, agents, retailers are under tremendous pressure to reduce the cost of the technology so that we can get a huge market penetration rate.Unfortunately, due to the lack of really good, understandable specifications, you will inevitably compromise something when you reduce the price.In terms of compact fluorescent lamps, we have a compromise on quality.In general, the average consumer buys the light source to provide the right quality of the light.In this trend of continuous cost reduction, we reduce the quality, which is an important driving force.What happened when we went too far in this matter was that some of these compact fluorescent technologies have become very cheap  and at the same time they have lost a lot of inherent qualities.They won't last long.This is bad because the end result is, yes, we have a very cheap technology that consumers will buy but they have a long memory.Product failures lack confidence in technology.What needs to happen to replace this bulb?When we only encourage very important energy efficiency, we compromise on other issues.Although we have made great progress, the market penetration rate of compact fluorescent lamps in this country is not impressive.Today, there is no reason why we do not use all energy-saving technologies at home.The reason we are not is that consumers do not like the technology.We need to overcome this.We need to develop lighting technologies that people really like.They like the color, the quality, the delivery, by the way, it's energy efficient.We need to encourage the industry to do so.It is very good that the industry can do this.Once we have the education that families need, the industry can enter and achieve.But consumers are already complaining about the cost of compact fluorescent lamps compared to incandescent lamps.Will improving quality not increase the price of compact fluorescent lamps?The price of the technology is falling sharply, but as I said, the quality is also falling accordingly.Using more stringent specifications to solve the quality problem, I think in the end we will see the maintenance or quality improvement, as well as the cost of the reduction as the volume increases.The main problem here is that without a fair competitive environment, high quality products tend to be punished in the market because of the demand for low quality products.cost.If we define a fair competitive environment, economies of scale can be applied equally, and we maintain quality while reducing costs.What can consumers do today to get the highest quality compact fluorescence?Consumers should do their best to educate themselves what kind of light sources are in their homes.Of course, we ask consumers to do more than they did in the past.If you go to any hardware store and buy an incandescent lamp, they are actually the same.This is the advantage of this technology.They all look the same, they all work the same, they all have good colors.Their only problem is that they are very inefficient.Moving to compact fluorescent technology requires more education for consumers.I think they need guidance on the product information available now.Now, the information available is still not enough, but better than before.I look at things like Energy Star.Energy Star is a sorting process in which you can see that these lights will reach some minimum standards.What we see on the road is a better specification because we have gained more knowledge and it can be said that this is a very, very effective light source, a bit like Energy Star plus.I think it will come.What about California's "Super C?F.L.” effort?In California, there is a broad partnership with utility companies that can consider the next step --High-generation specificationsCompact fluorescent lamps for the home.Also, I think we will see L.E.D., light-LED technologyBut if I look aroundTerm horizon, in the next one to four years, most of the energy we will save for residential lighting in this country will be compact fluorescent lamps.L.E.D.S is very fast. I thought I was moving again.We have great opportunities in energy efficiency and product comfort.Compact fluorescence is very close to being a great opportunity to save a lot of energy.Overall, as we move from incandescent technology to high technology, there will be considerable market changes.Efficiency technology.This will require a quick boost in learning curve from consumers and manufacturers and their ability to deliver the technology consumers want.This original article was written by Leora Broydo Vestel and can be found here.